Okay, to recap: Sarah Palin was heavily criticized for not being experienced enough or ready to take over in the event that something happened to the President. So, to combat that, she’s going to be a less than one-term governor who might try to run against a sitting President in 2012.
Makes perfect sense to me. (Also, it’s opposite day.)You seem to forget that a first-term Senator who had accomplished little beat an influential fourth-term Senator who had been a Congressman and an officer in the Navy prior. Your argument has proven invalid less than a year ago. You should maybe focus on the fact she’s a giant hypocrite or a fucking moron, but unfortunately Obama is both of those as well.
President Obama could show that he was prepared and, actually, you know, smart enough (e.g. able to form complete and coherent sentences), to be President. She was not. Even if she wasn’t smart enough, more experience would have helped to boost her credibility to run in 2012.
However, like I mentioned in my next post, she may not be running in 2012, so this argument is moot. It’s way too early to tell/care.
RSS
Archive
Mobile